Browser Geolocation API Tester

Trigger the browser geolocation prompt and inspect latitude/longitude, accuracy, and timestamps.

Browser Geolocation API Tester

Trigger the permission prompt and capture latitude/longitude from your browser.

If unchecked, you can submit manual coordinates without triggering a prompt.
How long the browser can take to obtain a position before failing.
Allow cached positions up to this age. Use 0 for a fresh fix.
unknown
Some browsers update this state only after a user gesture.
Include browser/OS versions or reproduction context for bug reports.
Geolocation typically requires HTTPS and user permission. If the prompt does not appear, check browser and OS location settings.
Requesting location…
No output yet
Click Get Location & Test to request permission and capture coordinates.
Tip: If you deny permission, uncheck “Use browser geolocation” and submit sample coordinates to test formatting.
Copied

About Browser Geolocation API Tester

Browser Geolocation API Tester for GPS Latitude and Longitude

The Browser Geolocation API Tester helps you request location permission and inspect the coordinates returned by your browser in a clean, repeatable way. Use it to verify that the permission prompt appears, to confirm latitude and longitude output, and to review accuracy and timing fields that can affect real-world apps. This tool is designed for developers, QA engineers, and product teams who need a fast, privacy-aware way to validate geolocation behavior across devices and browsers.

Because geolocation results depend on a mix of GPS, Wi‑Fi positioning, cellular signals, device sensors, and browser policies, small environment changes can create big differences in output. A dedicated tester makes those differences visible: you can capture the exact values the browser returns, compare them across scenarios, and attach the output to tickets or test reports.

How Browser Geolocation API Tester Works

When you click the tool’s primary button, your browser runs navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition() and shows the standard permission prompt (if you have not granted or denied access yet). If permission is granted, the browser returns a Position object with latitude, longitude, and related metadata such as accuracy, timestamp, and optional motion fields. The tool then submits those values to the server so they can be displayed, copied, and downloaded in a consistent format.

The tool also captures the permission state when possible (prompt, granted, denied). This is useful because many “geolocation is broken” reports are actually permission issues: a prior denial, a browser setting that blocks location globally, an enterprise policy, or a site that is not running in a secure context. By recording both the options you selected and the state you were in, you can reproduce issues more reliably.

Step-by-Step

  • 1. Configure options: Choose whether to use high accuracy, set timeout, and optionally set a maximum cached age.
  • 2. Request permission: Click “Get Location & Test” to trigger the browser’s geolocation permission flow.
  • 3. Capture coordinates: If permission is granted, the tool records latitude, longitude, and accuracy (in meters) plus available fields like altitude, heading, and speed.
  • 4. Submit and format: The values are formatted for readability (including consistent decimal precision) and stored in a JSON payload.
  • 5. Review results: The result panel shows a summary, map links, and the full JSON output you can copy into bug reports.
  • 6. Share safely: Download the output as a file for QA evidence, or replace live coordinates with sample values when you do not want to disclose your exact location.

Key Features

One-click permission prompt verification

The tool is built around the real browser permission flow. This makes it practical for confirming that “Allow location” prompts appear as expected, and for spotting differences between Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and embedded WebViews. It also helps you validate the full lifecycle: first-time prompts, previously granted permissions, previously denied permissions, and scenarios where the user must re-enable access in browser settings.

In QA, you can pair this with browser profiles or private windows to ensure you are testing the correct state. The output becomes a simple record you can attach to a ticket: “prompt shown, permission granted, coordinates returned” or “prompt not shown, permission denied, no coordinates.”

Full coordinate and metadata capture

Beyond latitude and longitude, the tool surfaces accuracy and timestamp values that influence UX decisions. On some devices, additional fields like altitude, heading, and speed may appear. Seeing these fields helps you understand what your app can reliably depend on and what may be null or unstable depending on sensors and movement.

Accuracy is especially important in product decisions. A map experience, a delivery estimate, and a “nearby offers” feature each have different tolerance for error. By comparing accuracy across networks, indoors versus outdoors, and high-accuracy versus default mode, you can choose sensible defaults and fallback behavior.

High-accuracy and caching controls

Geolocation calls can behave differently depending on enableHighAccuracy, timeout, and maximumAge. This tester exposes those options so you can reproduce edge cases like slow GPS fixes, Wi‑Fi-only estimates, or cached results returned instantly. For example, a non-zero maximum age may produce “stale” coordinates when a device moves between calls, while a short timeout can reproduce cases where your UI must handle failure quickly.

These controls also help you validate app-level decisions such as “show a skeleton loader for up to 8 seconds” or “fallback to last known location if a fresh fix takes too long.” You can test those policies before wiring them into production logic.

Copyable and downloadable output

The result panel includes a JSON output block that is easy to paste into issue trackers. You can also download the output as a file for test evidence, reproducible reports, or audit trails during release QA. The payload is structured to keep the most important fields front and center: coordinates, accuracy, timestamp, permission state, and the options used for the request.

If you work with automated QA documentation, the downloaded file can be archived alongside screenshots or device logs. For support teams, it can reduce the “tell us your browser version” back-and-forth by keeping relevant context in one place.

Privacy-aware testing workflow

Location data can be sensitive. The tool supports a manual mode where you can submit sample coordinates instead of your live position. This is useful for demos, documentation, training, and validating formatting without exposing personal information. In organizations with strict privacy policies, manual mode lets you test the UI and output format while keeping real coordinates out of shared systems.

When you do test live geolocation, prefer using non-production accounts and avoid sharing outputs broadly. Treat the JSON payload as you would other personal data: minimize retention, share only when needed, and remove exact coordinates when a rough location is sufficient.

Use Cases

  • Cross-browser QA: Confirm permission prompts, coordinate formats, and accuracy differences between browsers and platforms.
  • Mobile regression testing: Validate that GPS access still works after OS updates, device policy changes, or permission resets.
  • WebView troubleshooting: Diagnose geolocation issues in in-app browsers and embedded experiences where permissions and HTTPS rules differ.
  • Release readiness checks: Capture evidence that location prompts appear and that your app handles denial and timeouts gracefully.
  • Accuracy benchmarking: Compare estimates from Wi‑Fi/cell triangulation versus GPS high-accuracy mode in the same environment.
  • Support and incident response: Ask users to run the tester and share the JSON output (when appropriate) to speed up diagnostics.
  • Education and onboarding: Teach teams how geolocation APIs work, what fields exist, and what “accuracy” means in practice.

Because the tool returns a structured payload, it is easy to standardize bug reports and reduce back-and-forth. Teams can agree on a single format for “location test evidence” and attach it directly to tickets. This is particularly valuable when an issue reproduces only on certain device models or only under certain network conditions.

The tester also supports workflow separation: you can validate permission behavior (prompt versus denied) independently from coordinate correctness. That separation helps you decide whether a fix belongs in your code (better error handling) or in documentation (instructions for enabling permissions).

Optimization Tips

Test with and without high accuracy

High accuracy can improve precision but may take longer and consume more battery on mobile devices. Run the test in both modes and compare the reported accuracy. If your product only needs city-level granularity, a faster estimate may be better for UX. When you see large jumps between calls, try moving outdoors and waiting for a stable GPS fix before drawing conclusions.

Use timeout and maximum age intentionally

A short timeout helps you reproduce “slow fix” problems and ensures your UI handles delays gracefully. Maximum age can reveal when cached coordinates are returned immediately. For apps that require fresh location, set maximum age to zero and validate behavior under real network conditions. For apps that tolerate cached data, test a non-zero maximum age and confirm that “last known” behavior is acceptable.

Verify secure context and device settings

Geolocation is generally restricted to secure contexts, so always test on HTTPS in production-like environments. Also verify that the device-level location toggle is enabled and that the browser has permission to access location services. In QA plans, include scenarios for “first visit”, “previously denied”, “permission revoked”, and “system-level location off” so you can document expected app behavior in each case.

FAQ

Location is sensitive data, so browsers require explicit user consent. The prompt helps users understand when a site is requesting coordinates and gives them control to allow or deny access. Some browsers also show indicators while location is being used.

Accuracy is typically reported in meters and indicates an approximate radius around the returned position. A smaller number generally means a more precise estimate, but it can vary based on hardware, environment, and available signals. Treat it as a hint for UX decisions rather than a guarantee.

Some fields depend on sensor support and device movement. Many desktop browsers will not provide heading or speed, and altitude may be unavailable even on mobile if the platform cannot estimate it reliably. If you need motion fields, test on a real device while moving in a safe environment.

Yes. Disable the “Use browser geolocation” option and submit sample coordinates instead. This is helpful for documentation, demos, and verifying output formatting without exposing personal data. You can also round coordinates before sharing if exact precision is not required.

Include browser and OS versions, permission state (prompt/granted/denied), the selected options (high accuracy, timeout, maximum age), and the JSON output from this tool. If possible, describe the environment (indoors/outdoors, Wi‑Fi on/off) because it affects accuracy. A short note about expected behavior versus actual behavior helps triage faster.

Why Choose This Tool?

Geolocation failures often show up as “it works on my phone” bugs: they depend on permissions, secure contexts, sensor quality, and timing. Browser Geolocation API Tester gives you a single, repeatable workflow to validate the full permission-to-coordinate pipeline and to capture evidence that is easy to share across teams. It reduces guesswork by showing the exact values returned by the browser and by recording the options used to request them.

Whether you are debugging a production incident, validating a release, or teaching teammates how the API behaves, the combination of live permission testing, configurable options, and structured output makes this tool a practical addition to any web QA toolkit. Use it as a quick smoke test during deployments, as a diagnostic helper during support escalations, and as a documentation companion when you define how your product should behave under denial, timeout, and low-accuracy scenarios.